Case 3303571/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Puwanendran v Golden Manor Healthcare (Ealing) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303571/2019
- Decision date
- 14 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Puwanendran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to enter a response. Employment Judge Ferguson entered judgment for the claimant, Mrs J Puwanendran, against Golden Manor Healthcare (Ealing) Ltd.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £864.
It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £783. No further reasoning, statutory test, or separate remedy breakdown was set out in the short judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £864. | Upheld | — | £864 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £783. | Upheld | — | £783 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,647
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.