Case 3303581/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Stamp v Pipe Supplies Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303581/2020
- Decision date
- 8 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Stamp
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP at Watford on 8 March 2021 before Employment Judge R Lewis. The claimant, Mr S Stamp, did not take part and there was no attendance or participation for the respondent, Pipe Supplies Ltd (in liquidation) (debarred).
The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment and ordered the respondent to pay £1,650.00. The judgment does not set out further detail on the calculation in the extracted text.
The tribunal also stated that any other claims failed and were dismissed. No additional remedy was awarded beyond the redundancy payment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,650 |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not identify this claim by name, but the case listing categories supplied for this matter include unfair dismissal; the tribunal's order states that any other claims fail and are dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,650
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.