Case 3303590/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Eastman v Nurture Landscapes Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3303590/2024
- Decision date
- 5 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Eastman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that the hearing took place at Reading on 5 May 2026 before Employment Judge Hawksworth. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The respondent was represented by Mr N Price, counsel.
The tribunal refused the respondent's application for costs. The written record does not determine the underlying listed claims for unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages or working time, and it records no award of compensation, costs, interest or other remedy.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The only determination recorded in the written judgment is that the respondent's application for costs was refused. The judgment does not record any determination of the underlying listed claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.