Case 3303602/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Antechs (St Ives) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3303602/2020
- Decision date
- 9 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KJ Palmer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21 because no ET3 had been received. Employment Judge KJ Palmer recorded that the claimant’s claims for notice pay, holiday pay and unlawful deduction of wages succeeded against Antechs (St Ives) Limited.
The tribunal awarded 4 weeks’ notice pay net of £1,083.00, 2 days’ gross pay of £123.15, and holiday pay of £923.62. The total award recorded in the judgment was £2,129.77, payable by the respondent to the claimant.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties. No further factual findings or legal analysis are set out in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for notice pay succeeded and awards 4 weeks’ notice pay (net) of £1,083.00. This has been mapped to breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £1,083 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for 2 days gross pay succeeded and awards £123.15. | Upheld | — | £123 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant’s holiday pay claim succeeded and awards £923.62. | Upheld | — | £924 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,130
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.