Case 3303608/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Nanikian Olela v IKEA Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3303608/2019
- Decision date
- 30 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Nanikian Olela
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. The tribunal dismissed the proceedings following that withdrawal.
No findings on the merits of the claims, liability, or remedy are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim; this claim type is taken from the listing category, not particularised in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim; this claim type is taken from the listing category, not particularised in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim; this claim type is taken from the listing category, not particularised in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim; this claim type is taken from the listing category, not particularised in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.