Case 3303616/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Wolt Group Ltd T/a Dogtas Exclusive — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303616/2019
- Decision date
- 23 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Watford on 23 October 2019, before Employment Judge Alliott, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for unauthorised deduction of wages and breach of contract were well founded.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £4,333.33. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was well founded and ordered payment of a gross sum of £4,333.33 together with the breach of contract claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal stated that the claimant's claim for breach of contract was well founded and ordered payment of a gross sum of £4,333.33 together with the unauthorised deduction of wages claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,333
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.