Case 3303618/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Dendy v Adel Abderrahmane Khalef and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303618/2024
- Decision date
- 22 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss J Dendy
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented to the Southeast Employment Tribunal on 2 April 2024. The respondents, Adel Abderrahmane Khalef and Zrada Ltd, failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that the claim could properly be decided on that basis.
The tribunal found that the respondents had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,315.01 gross, and that they had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, ordering payment of £692.95. The respondents were ordered to pay the claimant £2,007.96 in total.
The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Anstis on 1 October 2025 and sent to the parties on 22 October 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment states £1315.01 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages; rounded to nearest GBP integer. | Upheld | — | £1,315 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment states £692.95 for unpaid holiday entitlement; rounded to nearest GBP integer. | Upheld | — | £693 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,008
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.