Case 3303630/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person. Assisted by: Mr C Smith, Stepfather. For the v Yendle Enterprises Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303630/2019
- Decision date
- 3 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person. Assisted by: Mr C Smith, Stepfather. For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Chisholm's claim against Yendle Enterprises Limited was heard by Employment Judge Laidler sitting alone at Bury St Edmunds on 3 July 2019. The respondent had not entered a response.
The tribunal dismissed the claim on limitation grounds. It found that the claim had been presented out of time and that it had been reasonably practicable for it to have been presented within the time limit.
No monetary remedy was awarded. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying working time complaint beyond the case listing context. The tribunal dismissed the claim because it was presented out of time and it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented within the time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.