Case 3303656/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Carey v Charterhouse Leisure Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303656/2020
- Decision date
- 22 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Carey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Charterhouse Leisure Limited was in administration and that neither the Administrator's consent nor the permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. It also noted that on 3 February 2021 the claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued, but no acceptable reason was provided.
On that basis, Employment Judge R Lewis ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying employment claims or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying claim type in the extracted text. The entire claim was struck out because the respondent was in administration and neither the Administrator's consent nor the court's permission had been obtained, and because the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after being invited on 3 February 2021 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.