Case 3303659/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303659/2024
- Decision date
- 1 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Laidler sat alone at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 14 January 2025. The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the post-termination allegations, and those allegations were dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the claim had been submitted out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. On that basis, all claims were dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded and the judgment records no substantive findings on the underlying merits beyond the procedural and time-bar rulings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment does not set out the substantive pleaded allegations, but the case was listed as disability discrimination. The tribunal dismissed the post-termination allegations for want of jurisdiction and also held the claim was out of time, with no just and equitable extension. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.