Case 3303660/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Susan Mayes v Hoyl Corporate Management Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303660/2019
- Decision date
- 9 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Susan Mayes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Mr A Spencer, sitting alone at Cambridge and hearing the case remotely via CVP on 8 and 9 February 2021, found that Miss Susan Mayes was unfairly dismissed by Hoyl Corporate Management Limited. The only substantive outcome recorded in the written judgment is that the unfair dismissal claim was upheld.
The written record also states that the respondent must pay compensation for unfair dismissal in the total sum of £3,924.66. It notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so the published text does not set out further factual findings or legal reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record records that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. | Upheld | — | £3,925 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,925
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.