Case 3303693/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Bollen v Curson Carpentry Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303693/2019
- Decision date
- 23 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Bollen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim by Mr S Bollen against Curson Carpentry Limited was heard at Bury St Edmunds on 23 August 2019 before Employment Judge M Warren. The judgment records that the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Cameron.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's breach of contract claim. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,730, described in the judgment as representing two weeks' gross pay. The sum was ordered to be paid without deduction and was stated to be taxable in the hands of the claimant.
No other substantive claims, findings, or legal tests are recorded in the written judgment extract. The decision was given orally at the hearing, and the written record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's breach of contract claim succeeded and awarded £1,730, described as two weeks' gross pay, payable without deduction and taxable in the claimant's hands. | Upheld | — | £1,730 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,730
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.