Case 3303700/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Hannibal v Anglo Precision Engineering Co Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303700/2019
- Decision date
- 30 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Hannibal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Foxwell entered judgment for the claimant, Mr D Hannibal, against Anglo Precision Engineering Co Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered it to pay the gross sum of £5,006.40.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £8,768.40. In a further finding, it held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £730.70.
The judgment records no additional reasoning beyond those determinations and does not identify any separate award components such as basic award, compensatory award, or interest. The bottom-line monetary liability on the face of the judgment is the sum of the three ordered payments.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,006.40. | Upheld | — | £5,006 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £8,768.40. | Upheld | — | £8,768 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £730.70. | Upheld | — | £731 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,506
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.