Case 3303713/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Fodor v Westwood Hotel Limited v — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303713/2020
- Decision date
- 8 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Milner-Moore Appearances
- Venue
- by CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Fodor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs N Fodor worked for Westwood Hotel Limited from 10 December 2018 to 15 December 2019 as a hotel receptionist/front of house supervisor on £8.21 an hour. Her contract provided 28 days' annual leave, four weeks' notice, and accommodation at £40 per week. The hotel closed from time to time, pay was agreed weekly although payslips were issued monthly, and the tribunal found that rent was not in fact charged in some months when the respondent had chosen not to do so.
For the holiday pay claim, the tribunal found that the respondent had no contractual right to place the employment on hold or to lay off staff, so the claimant remained employed during August 2019. It accepted that she had been paid £422 for holiday taken up to 31 July 2019, but held that on termination she had 11.5 days of untaken leave outstanding and also accrued 2.15 days during the four-week notice period. Applying regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the tribunal calculated £755 for leave accrued to termination and £141 for leave accrued during notice, and awarded £896 gross for unpaid holiday pay.
The tribunal rejected the respondent's attempt to reduce the leave award by £420 alleged rent arrears. It found either that rent was not due for some months because the respondent had chosen not to charge it, or that in any event the respondent had not proved the amount or how it was calculated. The tribunal also noted that the respondent had advanced different accounts of the sum said to be owed.
The claimant was allowed to amend her case to add a contractual notice claim. The tribunal accepted the respondent's own ET3 case that notice had been given on 8 December 2019 and held that the contract required four weeks' notice. It calculated gross notice pay at £1,313.60, deducted £160 for rent over the notice period, and then made estimated deductions for tax and national insurance, producing a net award of £1,056.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal found that 11.5 days of untaken leave accrued at termination plus 2.15 days accrued during the notice period, producing £755 + £141 = £896 gross. | Upheld | — | £896 |
| Breach of contract | Contractual notice claim added by amendment. The tribunal held the contract required 4 weeks' notice and awarded £1,056 net after an assumed £160 rent deduction and estimated tax/NIC. | Upheld | — | £1,056 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,952
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- article 3 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.