Case 3303717/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Prior v PRL Realisations 1 Limited (In Administration) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303717/2020
- Decision date
- 29 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle JUDGMENT
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr D Prior
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr D Prior's claims for unfair dismissal and notice pay/unlawful deduction of wages were dismissed. The reasons section states that the claim against the second respondent was no longer actively pursued because the claimant failed to attend the hearing on 17 March 2022.
The tribunal also noted that, in any event, the claimant had never been employed by the second respondent, PRL Realisations 1 Limited (In Administration) was the first respondent named in the judgment, and no monetary award was made. The decision was sent to the parties on 29 March 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. It recorded that the claimant did not attend the hearing on 17 March 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismissed the notice pay/unlawful deduction of wages claim. As to the second respondent, the tribunal said the claim was no longer actively pursued because of the claimant's failure to attend and, in any event, he was never employed by the second respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.