Case 3303724/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Miss A Boje v Banbury Heights Limited — 2021

Case reference: 3303724/2020
Decision date: 21 April 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Anstis Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss A Boje

Respondent

Banbury Heights Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Anstis recorded on 21 April 2021 that the claimant had failed to comply with the deposit order of 20 January 2021. As a result, any race discrimination claim other than the matter set out below was struck out on 16 March 2021.

The judgment also recorded non-compliance with the unless order of 20 January 2021. On that basis, any other claims included within the case were struck out on 17 February 2021, except for the claims listed as continuing in paragraph 3.

The claims that continued were the unlawful deduction from wages claim described at paragraph (3) of the order of 20 January 2021 and the amendment set out in the claimant's email of 17 May 2020, as further described at paragraph 2.2 of the order. The judgment did not determine the merits of those continuing matters and did not record any monetary award. It also stated that it was not intended to affect separate proceedings under case numbers 3300060/2021 and 3305852/2021.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	The tribunal said that, because the claimant failed to comply with the deposit order of 20 January 2021, any race discrimination claim other than the matter set out below was struck out on 16 March 2021. The amended race discrimination matter referred to in paragraph 3(b) was listed among the claims that continued.	Struck out	Race	—
Other	The tribunal said that, because the claimant failed to comply with the unless order of 20 January 2021, any other claims included within the case were struck out on 17 February 2021, except for the claims identified as continuing in paragraph 3.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.