Case 3303726/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Bomis v And Stovells FA Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3303726/2020
- Decision date
- 18 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Bomis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent's response had been struck out under rule 28(2) because there had been no response to the notice and order dated 15 June 2020. The judgment was issued under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Following that default position, the tribunal ordered Stovells FA Limited to pay Mr P Bomis £2,484.80 as compensation for breach of contract. The judgment does not set out any separate award components beyond that single figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the respondent's response was struck out under rule 28(2) after no response to the notice and order dated 15 June 2020, and then ordered payment of £2,484.80 as compensation for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £2,485 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,485
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 28(2)
- Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.