Case 3303728/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Smith (In person) For the v The Insolvency Service Redundancy Payments Service — 2024
- Case reference
- 3303728/2023
- Decision date
- 12 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Smith (In person) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Cowen, sitting alone at Watford Tribunal by CVP on 12 July 2024, heard the claim of Mr G Smith against The Insolvency Service Redundancy Payments Service. The Claimant appeared in person; the Respondent did not attend. Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not provided.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £3,313.28 in respect of notice pay and £518.72 in outstanding redundancy pay, together with interest on these sums of £909.62, producing a total award of £4,741.62. The written record sets out the figures but does not contain detailed factual findings or legal analysis beyond the order itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded as breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £3,313 |
| Redundancy | Outstanding redundancy pay awarded. | Upheld | — | £519 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,742
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.