Case 3303747/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Ungureanu v Banbury Heath Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303747/2019
- Decision date
- 5 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Ungureanu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a strike out judgment in Ms A Ungureanu v Banbury Heath Ltd. It recorded that by a Notice and Order dated 3/9/20 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, or did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out under rule 37. No substantive liability issue or remedy issue was determined in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. A Notice and Order dated 3/9/20 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but she failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.