Case 3303756/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Martin Wright v Homestead Garden Rooms Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303756/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Chudleigh Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Martin Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Reading by Cloud Video Platform on 21 April 2021, before Employment Judge Chudleigh sitting alone, the tribunal dealt with Martin Wright's claim against Homestead Garden Rooms Limited arising from dismissals on 12 March 2020. The tribunal found that the respondent had breached s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 by failing to consult about the dismissals of 20 employees.
As a result, the tribunal made a protective award equivalent to eight weeks' pay. The judgment records the amount payable to the claimant as £3,936. No separate split of the award is given beyond that figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found a breach of s.188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to consult about the dismissals of 20 employees on 12 March 2020. It ordered a protective award equivalent to eight weeks' pay, quantified at £3,936. | Upheld | — | £3,936 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,936
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.