Case 3303769/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gloag (counsel) For the v Mr Foster (director) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303769/2020
- Decision date
- 8 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen
- Venue
- Watford E m p l o y m e n t T r i b u n a l
- Panel members
- Ms A Brosnan, Mr C Juden
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gloag (counsel) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that the claimant’s claims for disability discrimination, age discrimination, unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction of wages were dismissed. The decision states that this was for the reasons given in the oral judgment at the hearing, but those reasons are not reproduced in the extracted text.
No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment. The extracted text therefore shows a complete dismissal of the pleaded claims, with no remedy figures or separate apportionment of any award. The hearing was before Employment Judge Cowen sitting with Ms A Brosnan and Mr C Juden.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed for reasons given in the oral judgment at the hearing; those reasons are not set out in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Age discrimination | Dismissed for reasons given in the oral judgment at the hearing; those reasons are not set out in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for reasons given in the oral judgment at the hearing; those reasons are not set out in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed for reasons given in the oral judgment at the hearing; those reasons are not set out in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.