Case 3303781/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Stowers v Select Snacks Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3303781/2020
- Decision date
- 29 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Stowers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Tynan in which the tribunal found that Mr G Stowers had been dismissed by Select Snacks Ltd in breach of contract because he was not given one week's notice of termination. The tribunal awarded him £205.53 as damages for that breach.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's complaint of disability discrimination was well founded. It awarded £4,562.83 as compensation for financial losses from the end of his notice period to 29 July 2020, described as 22 weeks and one day's pay, calculated on net weekly earnings of £205.53.
The judgment states that the claimant's claim for compensation for financial losses from 29 July 2020 onwards, and his claim for injury to feelings, were to be determined separately by the tribunal. No separate award for those matters is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract because the claimant was not given one week's notice of termination. | Upheld | — | £206 |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the disability discrimination complaint well founded and awarded compensation for financial losses from the end of the notice period to 29 July 2020, calculated as 22 weeks and one day's pay based on net weekly earnings of £205.53. Further financial losses after 29 July 2020 and injury to feelings were left for separate determination. | Upheld | Disability | £4,563 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,768
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,563
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.