Case 3303802/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Dr Taiwo, Union representative For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303802/2019
- Decision date
- 13 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Palmer
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Dr Taiwo, Union representative For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Watford hearing on 13 November 2019, before Employment Judge C Palmer sitting alone, the tribunal recorded that the claimant was represented by Dr Taiwo and the respondent by Miss Ling, Counsel. The written judgment does not contain substantive findings on the merits of the pleadings because the claims were not determined after a contested merits decision.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim for disability discrimination and her claim for detriment for making a public disclosure were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. No findings were made on liability, no legal test was set out in the written record, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the detriment claim for making a public disclosure was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.