Case 3303851/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Burley, Husband v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303851/2019
- Decision date
- 29 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kurrein JUDGMENT
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr D Burley, Husband
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 29 October 2019, Employment Judge Kurrein sitting at Bury St Edmunds held that Country Court Care Homes Limited had unfairly constructively dismissed the Claimant, Mrs P R Burley. The judgment records no other liability findings and gives extempore oral reasons only.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay a basic award of £1,284.00 and a compensatory award of £2,867.97. It also recorded that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply to any part of those awards.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the Respondent had unfairly constructively dismissed the Claimant and ordered a basic award of £1,284.00 and a compensatory award of £2,867.97. The Recoupment Regulations were stated not to apply. | Upheld | — | £4,152 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,152
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,284
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,868
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.