Case 3303860/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Marshall Mr J Kenny Mr J Collender v Truckeast Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303860/2019
- Decision date
- 16 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Marshall Mr J Kenny Mr J Collender
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 6 March 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claims should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimants had not complied with the Tribunal’s order for further information dated 28 May 2020 and that the claims had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims. The hearing fixed for 15 to 19 November 2021 will not take place.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim labels in the text; this classification is based on the case listing categories rather than the reasons section. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim labels in the text; this classification is based on the case listing categories rather than the reasons section. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim labels in the text; this classification is based on the case listing categories rather than the reasons section. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.