Case 3303861/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Chaumoo v Tony Mahama — 2024
- Case reference
- 3303861/2023
- Decision date
- 14 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Chaumoo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 January 2024, the Tribunal gave Ms A Chaumoo an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The Tribunal noted that the correct respondent appeared to be The Talented Online Ltd, which had been dissolved, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Ms Chaumoo did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment was signed by Regional Employment Judge Foxwell Date on 5 March 2024 and sent to the parties on 14 March 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not state the substantive claim type; this classification is taken from the gov.uk listing category. The claim was struck out because the Tribunal considered the correct respondent may have been The Talented Online Ltd, a dissolved company, and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.