Case 3303872/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Kamothi v Glow Beauty Bar Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303872/2018
- Decision date
- 10 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Kamothi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 10 February 2021, Employment Judge Anstis struck out Mrs K Kamothi's claim against Glow Beauty Bar Limited. The reasons state that by a letter dated 15 January 2021 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The extracted judgment does not record a substantive determination of the underlying wage issue, nor does it record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out for non-active pursuit after the claimant failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 15 January 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.