Case 3303873/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Turner v Total Home Delivery Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303873/2025
- Decision date
- 16 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gordon Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Turner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 judgment issued without a response from the respondent. The Tribunal was satisfied that the claim form had been sent to the respondent in accordance with rule 16 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024, and that the claimant had provided further information enabling a determination to be made on the papers.
The Tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to be well founded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,040 net within 14 days. The breach of contract claim for notice pay, brought under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994, was also well founded; the claimant's statutory notice period was one week and he had not been paid for it, so the respondent was ordered to pay £520 net within 14 days.
The redundancy payment claim under section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was struck out pursuant to rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 because the claimant had not been employed by the respondent for two years or more, as required by section 155 of that Act, and he had not replied to the strike out warning letter the Tribunal sent on 16 January 2025.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996 found well founded; respondent ordered to pay £1,040 net within 14 days. | Upheld | — | £1,040 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994; statutory notice period was one week. Respondent ordered to pay £520 net within 14 days. | Upheld | — | £520 |
| Redundancy | Struck out pursuant to rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 because the claimant had not been employed for two years or more as required by s.155 Employment Rights Act 1996 and did not reply to the strike out warning letter sent on 16 January 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,560
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 13
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 135
- Employment Rights Act 1996 section 155
- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.