Case 3303878/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ko Thett Ko v Allicare Limited, (in Voluntary Liquidation) Heard: At Norwich by CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303878/2020
- Decision date
- 10 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ko Thett Ko
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 10 January 2022 before Employment Judge M Warren in Norwich by CVP, the tribunal recorded that no response had been received in time. On that basis, the claimant's wages claim and his complaint of race discrimination succeeded.
The judgment ordered the respondent, Allicare Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation), to pay the claimant £250 in respect of the wages claim and £1,000 as compensation for injury to feelings for the race discrimination complaint, both without deduction. The judgment does not set out any further liability reasoning or written reasons, because the reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this only as the claimant's 'wages claim' and orders payment of £250 without further legal characterisation. | Upheld | — | £250 |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal upheld the complaint of race discrimination and awarded £1,000 compensation for injury to feelings. | Upheld | Race | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.