Case 3303885/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Sandilands, assisted by her husband For the v Mrs F Mesher, assisted by her husband — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303885/2024
- Decision date
- 10 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Sandilands, assisted by her husband For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 20 January 2025 before Employment Judge Laidler. The judgment records that the claimant's redundancy payment claim was submitted out of time. The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear that claim and dismissed it.
The tribunal reached the same conclusion on the claims for unpaid wages and holiday pay. It found those claims were also submitted out of time, held that it had no jurisdiction, and dismissed them. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were recorded beyond the limitation and jurisdiction points.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claim was submitted out of time and that it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the unpaid wages claim was submitted out of time and that it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held the holiday pay claim was submitted out of time and that it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.