Case 3303889/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Ashley, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303889/2019
- Decision date
- 1 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr N Ashley, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Norwich on 1 August 2019, before Employment Judge Postle, the tribunal recorded that Mrs F Williams's claims against Pearlcare Acle Limited were dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment states that the parties had reached an agreement by way of settlement of all claims.
The written record does not contain findings on liability, any separate analysis of the pleaded claims, or any monetary award. It is a short disposal judgment, and it notes that written reasons would not be provided unless a request had been made at the hearing or within 14 days of sending the written record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment records that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal after the parties reached settlement of all claims. No separate liability findings or remedy were made in the written record. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal after the parties reached settlement of all claims. No separate liability findings or remedy were made in the written record. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.