Case 3303890/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Holness v British Gas Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303890/2018
- Decision date
- 23 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mrs R A Watts Davies, Mr J Appleton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Holness
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded judgment after a hearing at Reading before Employment Judge Anstis, Mrs R A Watts Davies and Mr J Appleton. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment states that the claimant was not subject to unlawful religion or belief discrimination. It also states that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant was not subject to unlawful religion or belief discrimination. The gov.uk listing category referred to race discrimination, but the judgment text itself identifies religion or belief discrimination. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.