Case 3303890/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Greenwood v Qube Qualifications and Development Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303890/2023
- Decision date
- 24 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Greenwood
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the respondent's premises at Bee House, Milton Park constituted an establishment for the purpose of s188 TULR(C)A. It also found that there was no recognised trade union or appointed or elected employee representatives for the relevant statutory purpose. The complaint that the respondent failed to comply with a requirement of s188 was upheld, and a protective award was made for a 90-day protected period beginning on 28 March 2023.
The Tribunal also held that the breach of contract complaint for notice pay was well-founded, that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages for 1 to 28 March 2023, and that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. It ordered payment of the stated sums for the protective award, notice pay, unpaid wages, and redundancy payment, with credit to be given for sums paid by the Redundancy Payments Service in relation to notice pay, unpaid wages, and redundancy pay.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award for failure to comply with a requirement of s188 TULR(C)A; protected period of 90 days from 28 March 2023. | Upheld | — | £9,892 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim was well-founded; damages equivalent to 8 weeks' net pay. | Upheld | — | £4,551 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 to 28 March 2023; gross sum awarded. | Upheld | — | £3,077 |
| Redundancy | Entitlement to a redundancy payment determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £6,923 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £24,443
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s188 TULR(C)A
- s188(1B) TULR(C)A
- section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.