Case 3303894/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Hartley v Qube Qualifications and Development Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Under — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303894/2023
- Decision date
- 7 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Hartley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe supplied document is a certificate of correction under Rule 67 for the judgment sent to the parties on 7 May 2025. It states that the judgment is corrected in block type in the title of the claimant of the corrected judgment, and it was approved by Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst on 16 May 2025.
The certificate also records that the corrected judgment was sent to the parties on 19 May 2025. It explains that any time limits for asking for written reasons, applying for reconsideration, or appealing are unchanged and continue to run from the date the original judgment or reasons were sent.
No substantive findings on liability, dismissal, redundancy, wages, breach of contract, or any other employment claim appear in the extracted text, and no remedy is recorded in this certificate.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The supplied text is only a certificate of correction under Rule 67. It does not set out any substantive claim, liability finding, or remedy. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.