Miss L Franklin v James Rubython — 2025

Case reference: 3303897/2023
Decision date: 14 May 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Tynan’s Letter

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss L Franklin

Respondent

James Rubython

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal struck out Miss L Franklin's claim. It recorded that the claimant's email of 7 April 2024 did not address Employment Judge Tynan's letter to the claimant dated 10 April 2024, and said the tribunal could not give advice as requested in the email.

Because there was no substantial response, the tribunal found that the claim was not being actively pursued and struck it out on that basis. No substantive liability findings or remedy awards were made in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Redundancy	The judgment strikes out the claim for not being actively pursued. The underlying claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing categories; the judgment itself refers only to "the claim" and does not separate claims individually.	Struck out	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment strikes out the claim for not being actively pursued. The underlying claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing categories; the judgment itself refers only to "the claim" and does not separate claims individually.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.