Case 3303901/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Sidney v The Organic Kitchen Company (CK) Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3303901/2019
- Decision date
- 1 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Sidney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Miss M Sidney against The Organic Kitchen Company (CK) Ltd. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £400 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £300 damages.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and orders payment of the gross sum of £400. | Upheld | — | £400 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £300. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £450. | Upheld | — | £450 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders payment of £475. | Upheld | — | £475 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,625
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.