Case 3303901/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Dowling v Town and Country estate agents, Waterbeach (also known as) VILLAGE HOMES CAMBRIDGE LIMITED — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303901/2024
- Decision date
- 13 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Dowling
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs K Dowling presented a complaint on 11 April 2024. There was no response to the claim, and the claimant did not communicate with the tribunal after the proceedings began. A final hearing listed for 28 July 2025 was postponed because no judge was available, and the case was re-listed for 24 September 2025.
Neither party attended the video hearing on 24 September 2025. The tribunal noted that it may dismiss a claim or proceed in the absence of a party, and that it must consider any available information about the reasons for absence. Having considered the available information, Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto concluded that the claim was not being actively pursued and dismissed it.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment does not specify the pleaded issue in the text; this classification follows the published case listing for unlawful deduction from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The published case listing also referred to a written pay statement issue, but the extracted judgment does not separate or name it; classified as other. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.