Mr R Suleman v The fragrance shop — 2025

Case reference: 3303917/2024
Decision date: 7 October 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Anstis Representation

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr R Suleman

Respondent

The fragrance shop

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At Reading, by CVP, Employment Judge Anstis dismissed the claimant's claim. The written record records no further findings beyond the dismissal itself.

The judgment also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The written record does not set out detailed reasons. It records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.