Case 3303921/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Miss J Phillips ( Company Secretary) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303921/2024
- Decision date
- 19 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge K J Palmer, sitting alone at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 9 and 10 June 2025, heard Mr W Butler's claims against Multimodal Logistics Limited. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by Miss J Phillips, Company Secretary.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages in respect of Statutory Sick Pay succeeded, and made a declaration to that effect, awarding £43.76. The Tribunal also found that the Claimant's claim for holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations succeeded, and awarded £438.00.
The total sum of £481.76 was ordered to be payable from 10 June 2025. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction of wages in respect of SSP. Tribunal made a declaration and awarded £43.76. | Upheld | — | £44 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations succeeded; £438.00 awarded. | Upheld | — | £438 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £482
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.