Case 3303927/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303927/2020
- Decision date
- 26 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford on 24 and 25 May 2022 before Employment Judge Alliott sitting alone. The written record identifies the claimant as Mrs Eileen Bellotti and the respondent as Santander UK Plc. The judgment states, in a single numbered paragraph, that the claimant's claims were dismissed.
No written reasons are provided in the record because reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the note states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted judgment therefore records the outcome but does not set out the tribunal's factual findings, legal analysis, or any separate assessment of individual heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment record does not set out the individual claim names, but the gov.uk listing for this case identifies breach of contract as one of the claims. The judgment states only that the claimant's claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment record does not set out the individual claim names, but the gov.uk listing for this case identifies unfair dismissal as one of the claims. The judgment states only that the claimant's claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.