Case 3303947/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Young v Fresh Cut Video Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303947/2024
- Decision date
- 16 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Young
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records a preliminary issue in Mr D Young's claim against Fresh Cut Video Ltd. The issue decided was whether, during the material time for the claim, the claimant was disabled by reason of depression and anxiety within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal found that the claimant was not disabled within that statutory meaning during the material time. The judgment records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested, so the PDF text does not contain the tribunal's detailed reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Judgment on preliminary issue only. The tribunal found the claimant was not disabled by reason of depression and anxiety within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 during the material time for the claim; written reasons are not included in the PDF text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.