Case 3303955/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Michal Karpiuk v Munnings Construction Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3303955/2020
- Decision date
- 27 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Michal Karpiuk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. Employment Judge Postle recorded that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, unpaid wages breach of contract, and unpaid holiday pay were well founded against Munnings Construction Ltd.
The extracted judgment text does not set out reasons, findings of fact, or any separate remedy calculation. It therefore supports only the outcome that all three pleaded claims succeeded, with no monetary figures recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was 'well founded' in a Rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the unpaid wages breach of contract claim was 'well founded' in a Rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the unpaid holiday pay claim was 'well founded' in a Rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.