Case 3303958/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Bobbi Matthew-Brown v HT Enterprise Luton Ltd. — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303958/2020
- Decision date
- 6 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Price Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Bobbi Matthew-Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Bobbi Matthew-Brown brought a claim against HT Enterprise Luton Ltd, heard at Watford by CVP on 18 March 2021 before Employment Judge Price. The judgment records that the claimant appeared in person, assisted by her McKenzie Friend and father, and that the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal dealt with a single claim for automatic unfair dismissal. It found that the claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. No other claims, liability findings, or remedy awards are recorded in the written judgment.
The decision notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's standard note. The written record therefore contains only the dismissal outcome and not a fuller explanation of the tribunal's reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records the claim as one for automatic unfair dismissal. It was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.