Case 3303959/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms. S. Hoare - Solicitor — 2025
- Case reference
- 3303959/2024
- Decision date
- 21 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grahame Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims for notice pay, holiday pay and other payments arising from the construction of his employment contract. The tribunal recorded that the accommodation allowance claim had been withdrawn, and that the remaining notice and holiday pay issues turned on whether the claimant was entitled to a longer notice period than the respondent had paid.
The tribunal found that the claimant was still in his probationary period when written notice was given, so clause 3.2 of the contract applied rather than the post-probation notice provisions in clause 9.2. It accepted that, in the educational context, a term's notice meant 12 weeks, and concluded that the claimant had been lawfully paid in lieu of that notice.
Because the claimant was not entitled to the longer notice period, the tribunal also found that no further holiday pay accrued during that period. The notice pay and accrued holiday pay claims were dismissed, and the respondent's costs application was also dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay. The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to 12 weeks' notice during his probationary period and had been lawfully paid in lieu of that notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday. The tribunal found no further holiday pay accrued because the claimant was not entitled to the longer notice period he contended for. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claimant had withdrawn a claim in relation to accommodation allowance, described as his claim for other payments. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 WLR 896
- contra proferentem
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.