Case 3303961/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Francesca Santos v Enness Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303961/2020
- Decision date
- 25 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clarke
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Francesca Santos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Watford by CVP on 28 July 2021 before Employment Judge Clarke sitting alone. The respondent's name was amended to Enness Limited. The claimant did not attend and was represented by nobody; the respondent was represented by Mr Jack Goguelin and Ms Elizabeth Sprake.
The judgment records that the claimant's claim was dismissed. The extracted text does not set out the underlying factual or legal basis for the claim, but the case listing identifies it as a breach of contract matter. The respondent's application for costs was also dismissed.
The written judgment states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment text does not set out the pleaded particulars; Layer 1 lists the case as a breach of contract matter. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.