Case 3303962/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Ertan Hazine v Enness Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3303962/2020
- Decision date
- 25 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clarke
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Ertan Hazine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal on 28 July 2021 by CVP before Employment Judge Clarke sitting alone. The Claimant, Mr Ertan Hazine, appeared in person. The Respondent was Enness Limited, represented by Mr Jack Goguelin and Ms Elizabeth Sprake. The tribunal amended the Respondent's name to Enness Limited and recorded that the Respondent's response submitted in relation to claim number 303962/2020 was accepted in relation to both claims.
The only substantive disposal in the written judgment was that the Claimant's claim for wrongful dismissal, described as a claim for failure to pay notice pay, was unfounded and was dismissed. The tribunal stated that its reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as a wrongful dismissal claim concerning failure to pay notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.