Case 3303975/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Lewis, counsel For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303975/2018
- Decision date
- 24 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wyeth
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr N Ramgolam, Mr S Bury
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mrs P Lewis, counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs N Leeks was disabled for Equality Act purposes by reason of fibromyalgia, anxiety and depression, and arthritis. She had been employed by Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust from 19 May 2014 to 20 December 2014 as a Band 5 Biomedical Scientist. The claims before the tribunal were direct disability discrimination under s13 Equality Act 2010 and victimisation under s27 Equality Act 2010, both based on negative references later given by Susan Kerry to two prospective employers in 2017.
On the evidence, the tribunal found that the claimant had genuine performance difficulties during her employment and that those difficulties were not caused directly or indirectly by disability. It accepted the contemporaneous probationary review documents, occupational health material, and management concerns about pace, task completion, and attitude. The tribunal found that the references given to Cambridge and UCL were broadly accurate and were an honest account of the claimant's period of employment, and that the two specific inaccuracies identified were not enough to undermine that conclusion.
The tribunal rejected the suggestion that the references were given because of the claimant's disability or because she had brought earlier proceedings. It found that the disability had no bearing on the content of the references and that the earlier tribunal claim, issued on 14 May 2015, was not made in bad faith and therefore was a protected act. Even so, the tribunal held that the earlier claim had absolutely no part to play in the nature or content of the references. Both claims were dismissed in their entirety, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination claim under s13 EqA 2010 arising from references supplied to Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and UCL in 2017. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Claim under s27 EqA 2010 based on the claimant's earlier tribunal claim number 3400800/2015; the tribunal found that earlier claim was a protected act and was not made in bad faith, but it had no part in the references. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s13 Equality Act 2010
- s136 Equality Act 2010
- Igen Ltd v Wong
- Madarassy v Nomura International Plc
- Laing v Manchester City Council
- Efobi v Royal Mail Group Ltd
- CLFIS (UK) Ltd v Reynolds
- s27 Equality Act 2010
- Chief Constable of West Yorkshire v Khan
- Hewage v Grampian Health Board
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.