Case 3303978/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Neale v Matthew Knight — 2023
- Case reference
- 3303978/2022
- Decision date
- 26 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Manley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Neale
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 26 February 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss A Neale an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Manley Date ordered that the claims be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the merits of the underlying complaints, and it does not identify the individual claim types within the extracted text.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 18 May 2023. No monetary award or remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying causes of action; it states only that 'the claims' were struck out because they had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 26 February 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.