Case 3303984/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Mary Condron v Blm Priory Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3303984/2018
- Decision date
- 24 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Henry Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Mary Condron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a strike-out decision under rule 37. The tribunal recorded that by letter dated 14 July 2019 the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out on the grounds that they had not been actively pursued and that the claimant had failed to comply with the Tribunal’s orders sent on 24 March 2019.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, within the time allowed. On that basis the tribunal struck out the claims. The judgment does not identify the substantive nature of the underlying claims or record any compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type(s); it states only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37 because the claims had not been actively pursued and the claimant had failed to comply with Tribunal orders. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.