Case 3303989/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Dodds v Canary Corporation Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3303989/2022
- Decision date
- 26 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Dodds
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy judgment in which Employment Judge Liz Ord recorded that the claimant, Ms S Dodds, represented herself and the respondent did not attend the hearing at Bury St Edmunds on 1 November 2022. The tribunal dealt only with unpaid holiday pay.
The tribunal found that the claimant's claim for unpaid holiday pay was well-founded. It accepted the calculation of 177 hours at £10.00 per hour and ordered the respondent, Canary Corporation Limited, to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,770.00, subject to any deductions required for tax and national insurance. Written reasons were not provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The remedy judgment found the claimant's claim for unpaid holiday pay, calculated as 177 hours at £10.00 per hour, to be well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum subject to deductions for tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,770 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,770
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.